Mature attachment and you may intimate doing work: A peek at past research

Mature attachment and you may intimate doing work: A peek at past research

Stephenson, K. Roentgen., & Meston, C. Yards. (2010a). When is sexual difficulties terrible for ladies? Brand new selective protective property value intimate dating. Log away from Intimate Medicine, seven, 3683–3694. doi:/j.1743-8.x.

Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2010b). Differentiating parts of intimate better-being in girls: Is actually sexual pleasure and you can sexual stress separate constructs? Log of Intimate Drug, 7, 2458–2468. doi:/j.1743-six.x.

Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. Meters. (2011). The fresh relationship ranging from sexual will cost you and you may sexual joy in females: A research of your own Social Replace Make of Sexual pleasure. Canadian Record regarding Human Sex, 20, 31–40.

Stice, E., Hayward, C., Cameron, Roentgen., Killen, J. D., & Taylor, C. B. (2000). Looks photo and you will eating relevant activities predict start of anxiety inside women kids: A beneficial longitudinal research. Record out of Unpredictable Mindset, 109, 438–444. doi:-843X.109.step three.438.

Swami, V. (2009). Human body admiration, news determine, and you may weight condition predict said out of plastic surgery certainly female undergraduates. System Visualize, six, 315–317. doi:/j.bodyim..

Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Gokee, J. L. (2002). Interpersonal has an effect on on body visualize development. Into the T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), System photo: A handbook of idea, search, and you may logical behavior (pp. 108–116). Ny: Guilford Press.

ter Kuile, Meters. Meters., Brauer, Meters., & Laan, Age. (2006). The feminine Sexual Function Directory (FSFI) additionally the Females Sexual Distress Size (FSDS): Psychometric characteristics within this a beneficial Dutch populace. Diary from Gender and you can Relationship Medication, thirty two, 289–304. doi:6230600666261.

Tylka, T. L. (2011). Self-confident psychology point of views toward looks visualize. Into the T. F. Cash & L. Smolak (Eds.), System visualize: A handbook regarding research, routine, and protection (pp. 56–64). Ny: Guilford Force.

van den Brink, F., Smeets, M. A beneficial. M., Hessen, D. J., Talens, J. Grams., & Woertman, L. (2013). Body satisfaction and you can sexual health in the Dutch women students. Diary of Sex Search, 50, 786–794. doi:fifty.

Wei, M., Mallinckrodt, B., Larson, L. A., & Zakalik, R. Good. (2005). Accessory, depressive episodes, and you can validation off notice versus someone else. Log from Guidance Therapy, 52, 368–377. doi:3890701268041.

Weller, J. E., & Dziegielewski, S. F. (2005). The relationship anywhere between close lover support appearances and the body https://datingmentor.org/escort/downey/ image disturbance. Journal out-of Peoples Decisions regarding Public Ecosystem, ten, 71–ninety-five. doi:/J137v10n02_04.

Wiederman, Yards. W. (1999). Volunteer bias inside the sex research using student players. Diary off Gender Browse, 36, 59–66. doi:4499909551968.

Willetts, M. C., Sprecher, S., & Beck, F. D. (2004). Article on intimate methods and you may perceptions within this relational contexts. Within the J. H. Harvey, A beneficial. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The brand new manual out-of sexuality within the close relationships (pp. 57–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Partners.

Woertman, L., & Van den Verge, F. (2012). Human body image and you may women sexual performing and you may choices: An assessment. Journal away from Intercourse Research, 49, 184–211. doi:86.

Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & ). ‘‘But I enjoy my personal body”: Self-confident human body image characteristics and you may an alternative design having younger-adult female. Human anatomy Visualize, 7, 106–116. doi:/j.bodyim..

Rights and you will permissions

Discover Accessibility This information is marketed beneath the regards to the fresh new Creative Commons Attribution Permit and that it permits people have fun with, shipment, and you may breeding in just about any medium, considering the first copywriter(s) together with resource are credited.

Cite this post

van den Brink, F., Smeets, Yards.A good.M., Hessen, D.J. ainsi que al. Self-confident Looks Image and Intimate Performing inside the Dutch Female College students: The fresh new Part of Mature Romantic Connection. Arc Sex Behav 45, 1217–1226 (2016).

Intimate Accessory

The latest design indicated extreme relationships between system appreciation, the brand new personal connection dimensions, while the intimate working domain names. From the design, one’s body prefer while the intimate connection variables told me cuatro.nine % of the difference within the sexual desire scores, thirteen.5 % of variance inside the stimulation score, sixteen.eight % of your own variance in lube scores, 16.8 % of variance into the climax scores, 28.5 % of one’s variance inside the satisfaction results, and eight.4 % of difference when you look at the absence of problems score.

Given that talked about from the Fraley ainsi que al. (2011), it was believed of the researchers that the nervousness and you will prevention aspect is unrelated considering theoretic considerations. This presumption might be also good, once the size is separable and you will conceptually separate. The truth that stress and avoidance are relatively very interrelated does maybe not indicate big overlap involving the stress and you will cures dimension (Fraley ainsi que al., 2011), but is possible that women who concern intimacy for the a certain dating in addition to often stop closeness and you may dependence within this relationship. Regardless of you to, you will be able one nervousness and you may prevention often go together for the actual practice, the brand new high relationship within dimensions in our test ple features. Results of a recently available meta-studies indicated that new anxiety-avoidance relationship is high among trials using the ECR-R compared to previous adaptation (ECR; Brennan mais aussi al., 1998), in trials built-up outside North america, and in examples with increased professionals in the the amount of time relationships (Cameron, Finnegan, & Morry, 2012).

Cards

Davis, D., Shaver, P. Roentgen., Widaman, K. F., Vernon, M. L., Follette, W. C., & Beitz, K. (2006). ‘‘I can’t score no satisfaction”: Insecure connection, inhibited intimate communications, and you may intimate dissatisfaction. Private Matchmaking, thirteen, 465–483. doi:/j.14750.x.

Siebenbruner, J. (2013). Was children substitution matchmaking and you will close dating having linking? Log from Scholar Innovation, 54, 433–438. doi:/csd..

Dejar un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Ingresar a tu cuenta
Logout
Open chat
¿Necesitas ayuda?